Add UniTaskAsyncEnumerable.SkipUntil, TakeUntil. Fix SkipUntilCanceled behaviour.

This commit is contained in:
neuecc
2020-06-29 01:10:18 +09:00
parent 23997f0f93
commit d9e20de8a5
5 changed files with 495 additions and 30 deletions

View File

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ namespace NetCoreTests.Linq
}
[Fact]
public async Task TakeUntil()
public async Task TakeUntilCanceled()
{
var cts = new CancellationTokenSource();
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ namespace NetCoreTests.Linq
}
[Fact]
public async Task SkipUntil()
public async Task SkipUntilCanceled()
{
var cts = new CancellationTokenSource();
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ namespace NetCoreTests.Linq
await c;
var foo = await xs;
foo.Should().BeEquivalentTo(new[] { 30, 40 });
foo.Should().BeEquivalentTo(new[] { 20, 30, 40 });
async Task CancelAsync()
{
@@ -102,5 +102,64 @@ namespace NetCoreTests.Linq
}
}
[Fact]
public async Task TakeUntil()
{
var cts = new AsyncReactiveProperty<int>(0);
var rp = new AsyncReactiveProperty<int>(1);
var xs = rp.TakeUntil(cts.WaitAsync()).ToArrayAsync();
var c = CancelAsync();
await c;
var foo = await xs;
foo.Should().BeEquivalentTo(new[] { 1, 10, 20 });
async Task CancelAsync()
{
rp.Value = 10;
await Task.Yield();
rp.Value = 20;
await Task.Yield();
cts.Value = 9999;
rp.Value = 30;
await Task.Yield();
rp.Value = 40;
}
}
[Fact]
public async Task SkipUntil()
{
var cts = new AsyncReactiveProperty<int>(0);
var rp = new AsyncReactiveProperty<int>(1);
var xs = rp.SkipUntil(cts.WaitAsync()).ToArrayAsync();
var c = CancelAsync();
await c;
var foo = await xs;
foo.Should().BeEquivalentTo(new[] { 20, 30, 40 });
async Task CancelAsync()
{
rp.Value = 10;
await Task.Yield();
rp.Value = 20;
await Task.Yield();
cts.Value = 9999;
rp.Value = 30;
await Task.Yield();
rp.Value = 40;
rp.Dispose(); // complete.
}
}
}
}